Non-Compete & Restrictive Covenant Enforceability Checker 2025
Non-compete clauses — also called restrictive covenants — are only enforceable if they protect a legitimate business interest and go no further than reasonably necessary. Answer these questions to assess whether your restriction is likely to hold up in court.
Your Restriction
Enforceability Assessment
Non-Compete Clauses — Enforceability and Your Rights
A non-compete clause prohibits an employee from working for a competitor or starting a competing business after leaving. These clauses are automatically void unless the employer can demonstrate they protect a legitimate proprietary interest and are no wider than reasonably necessary. Courts approach them with scepticism and construe them narrowly.
What Makes a Non-Compete Enforceable?
- Legitimate business interest: Trade secrets, confidential information, or customer relationships genuinely needing protection
- Reasonable duration: Typically 3–12 months; longer periods need strong justification
- Reasonable geographic scope: Cannot cover areas where the employer has no real business presence
- Reasonable activity scope: Cannot prevent working in an entire field — only genuinely competing activities
Government's Proposed 3-Month Cap
In December 2023, the government published proposals to limit non-competes to a maximum of three months. As of 2025 these have not been enacted into law, but they signal policy direction and may influence how courts assess longer restrictions. Many employment law specialists now advise drafting new non-competes within three months to ensure enforceability if the proposals become law.
Types of Post-Termination Restrictions
- Non-compete: Prohibits working for a competitor entirely — hardest to enforce
- Non-solicitation: Prevents approaching former clients — generally easier to justify
- Non-dealing: Prevents any business with former clients even if they approach you — courts scrutinise closely
- Non-poaching: Prevents recruiting former colleagues
Even if a non-compete is unenforceable, non-solicitation and non-dealing clauses may remain independently enforceable. Always review all restrictive covenants together, not just the headline non-compete.
Garden Leave and Its Effect on Enforceability
Courts take prior garden leave into account when assessing whether a post-termination non-compete is reasonable in duration. Six months of garden leave followed by a six-month non-compete may be harder to justify than six months non-compete with no garden leave — the client relationships have already naturally diminished. The combined effect of garden leave plus post-termination restrictions is assessed as a whole.
The Blue Pencil Rule — Partial Enforcement
Courts can enforce a reduced version of an overly broad restriction by deleting words — but cannot rewrite or modify it. If a non-compete covers 10 countries but only 3 are legitimate, the court might strike out the 7 and enforce the remaining 3. Courts will not substitute a shorter duration for an unreasonably long one — the entire duration clause fails if unreasonable. A badly drafted clause may be entirely unenforceable while a well-drafted slightly shorter one would have been fully enforceable.
When Your Employer Cannot Enforce a Non-Compete
An employer who repudiates a contract — for example through constructive dismissal or wrongful termination — may lose the right to enforce restrictive covenants. The principle is that post-termination restrictions are only enforceable if the employer complied with their own contractual obligations. If your dismissal was wrongful (breach of notice entitlement or contractual terms), you have a strong argument that any non-compete is unenforceable.
Injunctions — How Employers Enforce Non-Competes
Employers who wish to enforce a non-compete quickly apply to the High Court for an interim injunction, often on an urgent basis. The court applies the American Cyanamid test: is there a serious issue to be tried? If yes, the balance of convenience determines the outcome. Interim injunctions can be obtained within days, potentially preventing you from starting a new role. If your employer is threatening enforcement, seek specialist employment law advice immediately before making any career moves.
The most effective protection for employees facing an overly broad non-compete is to seek an early written agreement from the former employer that they do not intend to enforce the restriction, or to obtain a specialist employment law opinion that clearly sets out why the clause is unenforceable — giving a new employer confidence to proceed with the hire despite the restriction being on paper.